Over the past two years, I have met the leaders of a relatively new physicians’ organization, the National Physicians’ Alliance, and I have been impressed by their agenda. Quite simply, they put patients first. Here is their mission statement:
“United across medical specialties, the National Physicians Alliance was founded in 2005 to restore physicians' primary emphasis on the core values of the profession: service, integrity, and advocacy. The NPA works to improve health and well being, and to ensure equitable, affordable, high quality health care for all people. The NPA strictly refuses financial entanglements with the pharmaceutical and biomedical industries. To learn more, visit this site.
I would describe the NPA as “the new AMA.” The NPA has been growing quickly, and it is stepping up to make its voice heard.
At the end of March, when the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) announced that it was going to sue to try to overturn health care reform on constitutional grounds, I asked Valerie Arkoosh, president of the NPA, if the organization would like to comment.
First, the March 29 announcement of the lawsuit from the PR Newswire :
“The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) [has become] the first medical society to sue to overturn the newly enacted health care bill, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). AAPS sued Friday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (AAPS v. Sebelius et al.).
"’If the PPACA goes unchallenged, then it spells the end of freedom in medicine as we know it,’ observed Jane Orient, M.D., the Executive Director of AAPS. ‘Courts should not allow this massive intrusion into the practice of medicine and the rights of patients.’
“’There will be a dire shortage of physicians if the PPACA becomes effective and is not overturned by the courts.’
“The PPACA requires most Americans to buy government-approved insurance starting in 2014, or face stiff penalties. Insurance company executives will be enriched by this requirement, but it violates the Fifth Amendment protection against the government forcing one person to pay cash to another. AAPS is the first to assert this important constitutional claim.
“The PPACA also violates the Tenth Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and the provisions authorizing taxation. The Taxing and Spending power cannot be invoked, as the premiums go to private insurance companies. The traditional sovereignty of the States over the practice of medicine is destroyed by the PPACA.”
The National Physicians Alliance Replies:
When the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) filed a lawsuit against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the organization’s Executive Director, Dr. Jane Orient, described the recently signed health reform legislation as “the end of freedom in medicine as we know it.” It is a bold, but ultimately wrong, statement of the history of American health care. Because in our broken system, the last thing patients ever experience is freedom.
For how can there be freedom in a health care system that segregates patients by wealth, health and whether or not an employer offers health insurance? Families have lost their fortunes under the current system, as reported last year in The American Journal of Medicine: 62% of the personal bankruptcies filed in 2007 were due to out-of-pocket medical expenses. On average, those expenses for families with private insurance equaled $17,749. For uninsured families, medical bills averaged $26,971. Others, because of pre-existing medical conditions, are trapped in unfulfilling jobs because that job offers health insurance and the next job might not.
More unjust than the loss of families’ economic security is the loss of life under the status quo. 45,000 uninsured Americans die every year. Those deaths are not from a misstep in biology or a failure of medical science. Those 45,000 Americans die from missteps in health policy –including a lack of investment in public health–and failures of insurance companies. Where’s the freedom in all of this?
The injustices that accompany lack of health insurance fall particularly hard on minority communities. Twenty-one percent of African Americans and 33% of Latinos are uninsured, significantly higher percentages than that of the general population. Over 40 years ago, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said, "Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane." The new health reform legislation takes bold steps towards rectifying this nightmare that has robbed Americans of their dignity, and yes, their freedom. Once fully enacted, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) will give 95% of Americans the basic human right to see a doctor when they need one.
Interestingly, also over 40 years ago, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons opposed another landmark piece of health policy: the Social Security Act of 1965, which created Medicare and Medicaid. President Lyndon Johnson signed the law on July 30, 1965, and established a historic cornerstone of health care for seniors. The very next day, the Board of Directors of the AAPS stated “the effect of the law is evil and participation in carrying out its provisions is, in our opinion, immoral.” The following week, on August 4, the AAPS urged its members to boycott Medicare.
So when Dr. Jane Orient describes the current legislation as “the end of freedom in medicine as we know it,” perhaps she is speaking from her organization’s longstanding tradition of opposing health care as a basic human right. Though her opinions might have been well received by many physicians in the 1960’s, today she and the AAPS are alone. During the struggle for health reform, 14 national medical organizations representing 500,000 doctors, including the National Physicians Alliance, came together to express their support for health reform.
Like many of those half a million doctors, the 20,000 members of the National Physicians Alliance have born witness to the inequities and inadequacies suffered by our patients and their families in the old broken system of American health care. We have given those patients and families a voice in the health reform struggle, and we applaud the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. We are glad to roll up our sleeves and pitch in to build better ways of caring for patients under this act. From the perspective of the National Physicians Alliance, the new health reform legislation is the first step toward ending the injustice in medicine as we know it.
Sanjeev Sriram, MD, MPH,
Director of Membership Communications and Outreach
Valerie Arkoosh, MD, MPH
President
National Physicians Alliance
My comment: In 1965 the AAPS called Medicare and Medicaid “evil.” Now they say that health care reform marks “the end of freedom in medicine as we know it.” It seems that over the course of 45 years, the organization has not learned that hyperbole is rarely persuasive.
It also appears that the leaders of the organization have not read the reform bill carefully. AAPS claims that the penalties for not buying insurance are “stiff.” Seventy-five dollars a year is “stiff”? See my post on “Myths and Facts about Health Care Reform” below.
AAPS also frets that as we extend coverage we will face a shortage of physicians. What is the alternative—to leave 30 million Americans uninsured?
I agree that we will need more primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, public health workers, psychologists and physical therapists. The legislation addresses these needs by providing new funding for med students who go into primary care, for doctors already practicing primary care, and for nursing school teachers.
It is not at all clear that we will need more specialists in many areas—including surgery. We already perform more surgeries than any other country in the world, and as Boston surgeon Atul Gawande points out, there is no evidence of better health or better outcomes as a result.
I had no idea that being denied health care represents a fundamental freedom. I doubt many of those experiencing that freedom would recommend it to others.
As I stood in line at the post office yesterday waiting for the window to open I heard two people behind me chatting about having to wait.
“I don’t like waiting” said the first. “Like when we go out to eat I don’t want to wait to get a table.”
“Yeah, I’m like that, too. If there’s a line, I’m outta there. Just like here…”
The counter opened and there was one employee on duty with a line about twenty long. A second employee was taking care of a couple of loose ends but joined the first in about ninety seconds.
“I guess they can do whatever they want since this is a monopoly.”
I didn’t argue with him but I wanted to point out that the post office is not a monopoly. If he wanted to do business with UPS, FedEx, or some other private service nothing was stopping him. But I doubt any of those services would be competitive if he was sending out wedding invitations or wanted to have a letter delivered to the roughest part of some distant city a thousand miles away. Certainly not for less than half a dollar per unit.
As I recall, when we signed up for Medicaid my wife and I had the option to not participate. (In fact, we both enrolled with Medicare Advantage and United Health Care made it unmistakable clear that out Medicare cards would no longer be valid. Our medical arrangements may be in compliance with Medicare rules, but except for that detail, every transaction is handled by a private, for-profit insurance company, thank you very much.
I’m not foolish. I know when something is a good deal, like the free hot dogs from the guy at Home Depot pushing home appliances. And I know the reason we have NO premium for MA is because the company is trying to capture as many Medicare beneficiaries as they can because they’re not stupid either.
And when I learned that Medicare Advantage was costing me and other taxpayers MORE than Medicare and is targeted for reduced tax money, my taxpayer heart rejoiced. I’m looking forward to the day when Medicare gets better as the result of the legislation passed.
And as for those who want to opt out, and to the physicians who want to serve them, I say “Buh-bye… No one’s making you do anything.” But it may be embarrassing a few open enrollment periods from now to find yourself coming back because your boutique plan and costs were not all you imagined they would be.
(Which reminds me. All this complaining about Medicare benefits being lost is just another piece of misleading agitprop. Medicare Advantage is totally run by the private sector and the only “government” part is the description of benefits. Getting the government out of private insurance would be akin to making planes fly without air traffic controllers or allowing eighteen-wheelers with unsafe loads and drivers with no sleep on the highways.)
The AAPS says it is ‘a non-partisan professional association’. Yeah, right. Their website looks like it’s put together by people with white hoods on.
Whatever do you mean Marc? Racial demagoguery was so 2009. Weak.
Chris, John, Marc–
Chris- Indeed. It falls under the heading of “free to choose healthcare that fits your pocketbook ” (or forced to choose . . . )
John-Yes, some doctors assume that they will be able to run a boutique practice without realizing that patients can be as fickle as doctors (who stop taking Medicare) — especially in a recession.
Great anecdote about the post office and the complainer behind you in line . .
Marc–
The way they remind everyone to bring their white lab coats to the tea/party rally does sound a bit like reminded people to bring their hoods–especially because virtually all of the people in the pictures on the home page are overweight white males.
Then there’s the fact that they insist reform will cover illegal aliens (an outright lie) and that it will increase abortions (another outright lie.)
Looking at the website it’s hard to believe that this is a professional medical society. Looks more like a NRA website.
Never fear. AAPS is a joke. Take a look at their “Journal.” Prominent among their causes: Creationism, Denial of fossil fuel burning risk, Fabricated health risk of abortion, etc. Base seems to be at a southern Oregon home school curriculum marketer. I looked into this when I ran across a local letter to the editor touting their collection of names of people with science degrees who disagreed that global warming should be a concern.
Richard K–
Very interesting.
The problem, of course, is that when their lawsuit is reported in the news, readers don’t know that they aren’t a typical professional organization.
I am a physician and had seen the AAPS Website earlier this year. When doctors forget that medicine is about people not making money, they need to change professions.I think that the attitude of the members of this organization are indicative of what is wrong with healthcare today. Maybe, the AAPS will evolve and find new careers.
cleo–
Thanks for commenting.
I agree. I think many of these docs just chose the wrong profession.
If the NPA is the new AMA as you suggest, then doctors are in an even bigger mess. Most physicians I am listening to are talking about opting out of medicare. What planet are you on?
Fed-up
I think you are doing the right thing by opting out.
Docs who are not happy with their job really shouldn’t be practicing medicine.
When I talk to med students, I find that many extraordinarily intelligent and thoughtful young people want to become doctors, even though they are well aware that they won’t make nearly as much money sasdocs who went through med school in the 1980s years expected.
There are alsa huge number of well-qualified med students lined up behind them who don’t quite get in–because their GPA is a fraction too low . .
I don’t think you will be missed; there are a great number of people out there who still view medicine as a vocation.
It is time for the Physicians and surgeons in this country to get the attention of the government and the people. This would have to involve other primary health providers in this country as well. We need a John L. Lewis of medicine for a spokesman and therefore every health provider should go on strike for 5 minutes all across this country at the same time. This definitely would get the bureaucrat’s attention. If this is a violation of antitrust then I would challenge this country to put us all in jail at the same time. Who is getting whom’s attention now.
Max G. Morgan–
This is one of the most bizarre comments that HealthBeat has ever received.
Are you suggesting that physicians and surgeons are as underpaid as coal miners–or that their working conditions are worse? John L. Lewis represented miners; see http://www.aflcio.org/About/Our-History/Key-People-in-Labor-History/John-L.-Lewis-1880-1969
Do you really think that most surgeons would be willing to go on strike for 5 minutes in the middle of surgery? (OTherwise, their work stoppage for 5 minutes wouldn’t matter to anyone)