Judith Mayer Lynn, uninsured and battling breast cancer, should be a fan of the Affordable Care Act. Instead, Bloomberg reports, she know little about it. When Bloomberg interviewed the 56-year-old she was unaware of subsidies in the law that will help people like her buy coverage in 2014,. “Lynn didn’t know the Affordable Care Act requiresthat insurers to pay for prescription drugs, hospital stays and other services she’s spent the last two years scrimping to afford. Nor did she realize she can no longer be denied a policy due to her illness”.
When told of the benefits, “Lynn remained unconvinced, skeptical of insurers and government alike. ‘It’s a joke,’ she said. ‘There’s going to be loopholes in all of these provisions.’”
If you showed Lynn the list of “essential benefits” that insurers will have to include in the policies they sell to people like her, could you persuade her to read the list—and explain where she saw the holes? Probably not. Her mind is closed.
In an interview at an Access to Healthcare office in Las Vegas, Lynn said she was unaware of those benefits — and didn’t trust Obama to produce them anyway.
The Poison: Hatred
Perhaps I shouldn’t be surprised. We live in a nation where in 2009, a U.S. Congressman felt free to shout out “You Lie” during a televised presidential speech to a joint session of Congress.
(President Obama had just said that the legislation would not mandate coverage for undocumented immigrants. This is, of course, correct. South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson (R) later apologized.)
Yet that didn’t stop another Congressional Republican from calling out the President earlier this month. In a scathing speech on the floor of the House, Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-OK) derided President Obama as a “dishonest, incompetent, vengeful liar” who lacks a “moral compass.” Bridenstine cited HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’ efforts to promote enrollment in the Affordable Care Act as one reason that President Obama is “not fit to lead.”
Bridenstine didn’t apologize. Instead, the next day he told a talk show host that he had “gotten great encouragement” for his remarks from fellow Republicans. /
I have followed U.S. politics for many years. Never have I seen a president so hated—not Nixon, not LBJ at the height of the War in Vietnam..
Politicians Are Not Alone in Teaching Americans Not to Trust Obamacare
Lynn recalls one of her surgeons telling her that he was leaving the business because the health-care law dictates what he can charge patients. This, Bloomberg notes, is “something the legislation doesn’t do. “
Why would a surgeon claim that the Affordable Care Act will be setting his rates? Presumably he reads newspapers. How could he be so uninformed?
“There is a lot of distrust,” Sherri Rice, chief executive officer at Access to Healthcare explains. When her nonprofit group began asking members about the ACA last month, about half knew little about its provisions and another quarter were “furious” about it, she told Bloomberg.
Such anger makes it difficult to think clearly—or take in information. This may explain why Lynn’s surgeon thinks that under the ACA he will be told what he can charge patients. Perhaps he, too, is so “furious” that the facts don’t register. Hatred blinds.
Educating the Public
The Brookings Institute’s Henry J. Aaron is one of many who blames the Obama administration for not doing a better job of educating the public. “We haven’t seen a lot of energy from the administration on public education. They ceded the field to those who were largely hostile to the bill to frame it in the public’s mind.”
Aaron is right that Obamacare’s opponents have “framed” the issue. They have outspent supporters by 5-to-1 on TV ads, according to advertising analyst Kantar Media. But their idea of “framing” is to define an idea with a catchphrase. If some facts don’t fit into the frame, they are ignored explains linguistics professor George Lakoff. The “frame” becomes a lens through which conservatives invite us to see policy issues. For example, Laskoff observes, the phrase “tax relief” creates a context, signaling that taxes are bad; this is why we need “relief.”
“Obamacare” is, itself a frame, which suggests that that the Affordable Care Act will create a “nanny-state,” with the president becoming a national nanny who will tell us what we must do.
When you are lying, repetition is important. (Hitler knew that.) Laskoff points to a speech by Rick Santorum where he repeatedly refers to the President “not listening to the voice of the American people” (14 times) “because he knows better than you” (5 times), and is using the Government to run your lives by taking away your “rights” (10 times), and “freedoms.”(12 times“Death panel” became one of the most successful frames.
Conservatives favor sound-bites that are short, snappy and click shut like a box. Like advertising slogans, they are designed to make people stop thinking.
More progressive formulations encourage thought. Often, they raise questions: is health care a “right”, a “privilege”, or a “moral responsibility”—something that, we as a civilized society, we owe to each other?
“Individual responsibility” is a phrase that conservatives favor. Each of us is responsible for ourselves. Period.
By contrast “shared responsibility” opens the mind to consider the possibility that employers, employees, government and the health care industry itself should share in funding universal healthcare.
It is difficult to explain Obamacare in a one-minute TV ad because health care reform turns on the details–thousands of details. And often, these are interlocking details: you cannot understand one without understanding the next paragraph in the legislation.
For example: If you are self-employed, unemployed or work for an employer who does not offer benefits you will be able to purchase your own coverage in the Exchanges—marketplaces where insures will be regulated and won’t be able to charge you more if you suffer from a pre-existing condition. If you earn less than $4600, you will be eligible for a government subsidy in the form of a tax credit that will help you pay the premium.
That is just one fact—and it I took me a full paragraph to convey who will be eligible for a tax credit .
But the definition also raises questions. For example a reader might well ask: ” If I have to wait until I get a tax credit (when I pay my 2014 taxes in April of 2015) how will I pay the premiums on my insurance at the beginning of 2014?”
The answer is that the IRS will forward the money to your insurer in 2014, estimating how large your subsidy should be based on your 2013 income.
Then when you file your 2013 taxes in 2014, you and the government will settle up. If your 2014 income turned out to be lower than expected, the government may have underestimated your subsidy, and will owe you money. If, on the other hand, you earned more than expected, the subsidy may have been larger than it should have been, and you will owe the government money.
To me, this sounds fair. But, it doesn’t fit into a soundbite. I spend two paragraphs explaining it. IIf a reader were skimming a newspaper story he might not take those two paragraphs —especially if he already had heard conservatives “frame” the idea that you might own the government money as a “tax credit trap.” Redstate.com suggests that the tax credit is a trick which will leave many Americans with what redstate.com calls “surprise tax bills” in the spring of 2015.
Suddenly the tax credit doesn’t sound like such a good deal–unless you took the time to read the full explanation..
HHS Says it Will Kick Up the Campaign to Explain Reform In October –When it Has the Facts –and the Public Is Ready to Act
Let’s return to the idea to the idea that the Obama administration has been too slow in educating the public. “For the last couple of years, the Obama administration has done too little to explain what was in the law, and to mobilize support,” says Henry Aaron.
But Bloomberg reports, in April of 2013 U.S. health secretary Kathleen Sebelius “offered a different take on timng: “’It didn’t make sense for the U.S. to contact the uninsured long before they can actually sign up for coverage.’”
I think Sebelius may well be right. Americans are not interested in poring over the many details of Obamacare when it seems a distant possibility. (Polls show that Conservative diatribes have convinced many that the law already has been repealed.)
People will be much more interested in listening to the facts about the ACA in October, when it is becomes clear that the law is a reality, and that they are faced with a decision. Should I sign up for insurance?
Right now Republicans are telling them that, under reform coverage will be unaffordable. Often they throw out numbers like “30% increases.”
Here the fear-mongers are speculating about the cost of insurance premiums in the Exchanges where individuals buy their own insurance. But keep in mind, only a small minority of Americans will purchase coverage in these Exchanges
Premiums in the Exchanges– Stll An Unknown
As for premiums in the individual Exchanges, today we have hard numbers for only a few states. In most cases Democrats cannot tell you exactly how much your coverage will cost in 2014 if you buy your own insurance. And we have very little information on how much small businesses will pay in their separate SHOP Exchanges. This makes it difficult to rebut claims that premiums will skyrocket.
Individual premiums depend on your age, your sex, your income, where you live—and how insurers decide to price their products. They will be competing for market share, and will be trying to calculate how to price their product to attract young, healthy customers.
Much will depends on where you live. In states like New York, insurers alreay have to folow most of the regulations in the ACA. For instance, they can’t charge more if a patients suffers from a pre-existing conditions. As a result, it is unlikely that individuals buying their own insurance will pay more than they do today; in most cases, they will pay less. In addition, many will be eligible for subsidies. .
On the other hand, if the customer is a healthy 30-year-old male who lives in a state where insurers are allowed to charge women three times as much as they would charge a man for exactly the same policy, and where they can charge someone suffering from a pre-existing condition four times as much, the 30-year old male may well be asked to shell out significantly more than he does today.
This is because, under reform, he, his sister, and his diabetic mother will find themselves on a level playing field: Insurers won’t be able to gouge his sister or his mother.
(Put that way, reform doesn’t sound so bad for the “Bros.” does it? Even a progressive can use hot-button words to “frame” an issue.)
But not how many words I needed to explain the variables that will determine whether your premiums will go up or down in the Exchanges.
It’s much, much easier just to scream “sticker shock.”
In October, the Administration Will be Able to Offer Specifics
In the fall, progressives will have an easier task. They will be able to say: “Here in North Carolina an individual will be able to choose from a menu of five plans that range in price from $____to $____a year. Here are the details on the co-pays and deductibles. You will notice that in the plans where premiums are lower, co-pays are higher. Butin all of these plans your total out-of-pocket spending will be- capped at $6500 a year—no matter which plan you choose, or how much care you need.”
Armed with this information, reform’s supporters will be able to answer the false claims that you are hearing today. (This is why the fear mongers are now becoming louder and increasingly hysterical—as we approach October they know their days are numbered.)
“Enroll America” also will be able to point out that: “different plans use different provider networks—you will find a list of their networks here. Some plans charge more because they think that you will pay more for their networks of hospitals and doctors. But they may be wrong: some customers will choose one of the less expensive plans.”
In October, progressives also will be able to will put premiums in the contexct of subsidies, and explain that “If you are single and earn X, you will receive a government subsidy of $______ . If you are a 40-year-old couple with one child earning Y, you will receive a tax credit of $_____. Subtract that from a premium of Z, and you will owe just $__________
When Obamacare’s supporters have hard numbers, and can spell out what reform will mean for YOU and your family, uninsured, self-employed and unemployed Americans will be much more eager to learn about the details of healthcare reform. This is when they will be ready for a crash course in Obamacare.
Educating the Public: Reaching Out at the Right Time, Oct. 2013- March 2014
As Joanne Peters, an HHS spokeswoman told Bloomberg: “ Our outreach will kick into high gear this summer leading into the fall, when we’ll be talking to Americans across the country to prepare them to enroll in coverage beginning October 1. Our deliberative tactics build on the lessons we’ve learned, including reaching people with the right message at the right time, when it’s time for them to act.”
“You want outreach and communications with real intensity in the six months when people can go online and sign up,” adds Tara McGuinness a White House spokeswoman, referring to the open enrollment period that begins in October 2013 and runs through March 2014. In six months, “Enroll America” should be able to get the facts out there to most of the people who, at that point, will want to hear more about how “Obamacare” might help them.
Granted, reformers still will have to contend with the lasting effects of the conservative campaign to plant seeds of suspicion. That crusade began in 2009. That’s four years of misinformation and outright lies.
Nevertheless in October of 2014, when “Enroll America” has the facts on pricing, I am hopeful that mainstream journalists will at last feel able and willing to call misinformation what it is: “a lie.”